Skip to content

 

Peer Review Policy

Overview

The International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Mechanics and Energy (IJISME) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing through a rigorous and transparent peer review process.

All manuscripts submitted to the journal undergo a double-blind peer review, ensuring that both the reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the evaluation process. This approach promotes objectivity, fairness, and scientific integrity.

Initial Editorial Screening

Upon submission, each manuscript is first evaluated by the Editorial Office or Editor-in-Chief to determine whether:

  • The manuscript fits within the scope of the journal

  • The submission meets the formatting and structural requirements

  • The manuscript demonstrates sufficient scientific quality

  • The similarity level complies with the journal’s plagiarism policy

Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be rejected before peer review.

Double-Blind Peer Review Process

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to an Associate Editor or handling editor who oversees the review process.

The manuscript is then sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant research field.

During the review, both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure impartiality.

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on several criteria:

  • Originality and novelty of the research

  • Scientific and technical quality

  • Methodological rigor

  • Clarity and organization of the manuscript

  • Relevance to the journal’s scope

  • Significance of results and contribution to the field

Reviewer Recommendations

After evaluation, reviewers submit their reports along with one of the following recommendations:

  • Accept without revision

  • Minor revisions required

  • Major revisions required

  • Reject

The Editor-in-Chief or handling editor makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations.

Revision Process

If revisions are requested, authors must submit:

  • A revised manuscript

  • A detailed response to reviewers, explaining how each comment was addressed

Revised manuscripts may be returned to reviewers for additional evaluation when necessary.

Final Decision

The final decision on acceptance or rejection is made by the Editor-in-Chief based on:

  • Reviewer reports

  • Scientific merit of the manuscript

  • Compliance with journal policies

Authors will be notified of the editorial decision via the journal’s submission system.

Review Timeline

IJISME aims to ensure an efficient review process:

  • Initial editorial screening: 3–7 days

  • Peer review process: 3–6 weeks

  • Final decision: typically within 6–8 weeks of submission

However, the review duration may vary depending on reviewer availability and manuscript revisions.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Provide objective and constructive feedback

  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript

  • Declare any conflicts of interest

  • Evaluate manuscripts within the agreed review timeframe

Reviewers must not use or disclose unpublished information obtained during the review process.

Ethical Considerations

The peer review process at IJISME follows internationally recognized ethical standards to ensure:

  • Fair and unbiased evaluation

  • Confidential handling of manuscripts

  • Protection of intellectual property

Editors and reviewers must disclose conflicts of interest and withdraw from the review process if necessary.